• Covid-19
  • Travel Protocols
  • Immigration & Customs Form
Saturday, May 31, 2025
SKNIS
  • Home
  • About
  • Press Releases
  • Parliament
  • In The News
  • Bills
No Result
View All Result
SKNIS
No Result
View All Result
Home Featured

CCJ DENIES SPECIAL LEAVE TO MAN SERVING TWO LIFE SENTENCES

SKNISEditor by SKNISEditor
June 21, 2023
in Featured, Press Releases
Statement by the CCJ’s President on the passing of Lady Beverley Walrond, QC
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

No. 13:2023

21 June 2023

Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago. On Wednesday, 21 June 2023, the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), sitting in Guyana, delivered its judgment for the special leave application, AB v The Director of Public Prosecutions [2023] CCJ 8 (AJ) GY. The CCJ denied the Applicant special leave to appeal to the CCJ to review a decision of the Court of Appeal of Guyana, which had affirmed the imposition of two concurrent life sentences on him. The Applicant will be eligible for parole after serving 20 years of the sentence.

Related posts

SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS HONOURS CENTENARIANS FOR THEIR LIFELONG CONTRIBUTIONS

SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS HONOURS CENTENARIANS FOR THEIR LIFELONG CONTRIBUTIONS

May 31, 2025
SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS APPLAUDED FOR HOSTING LANDMARK GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE ISLANDS SUMMIT

SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS APPLAUDED FOR HOSTING LANDMARK GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE ISLANDS SUMMIT

May 30, 2025

The Applicant was charged with two counts of sexual activity with a child contrary to the Sexual Offences Act of Guyana. He was convicted in 2018 and immediately sentenced by the Mme. Justice Jo-Ann Barlow to two concurrent life sentences, with 20 years to be served before his eligibility for parole. He appealed his conviction and sentence to the Court of Appeal in 2018. Subsequently, the Court of Appeal delivered a unanimous judgment, dismissing his appeal and affirming his conviction and sentence.

The Applicant then applied for special leave to appeal to the CCJ. He contended that his sentence was manifestly excessive and that the sentencing process of Justice Barlow was flawed. He also contended that the Court of Appeal’s failure to review and correct these errors amounted to a serious miscarriage of justice which justified the granting of special leave by the CCJ.

In a judgment authored by Justice Jamadar, the CCJ held that the principal question for determination was whether the Applicant satisfied the requirements of special leave. In order to be granted special leave, the Applicant was required to show that there was a realistic possibility that a serious miscarriage of justice may have occurred. According to the CCJ, in order to satisfy this test, the Applicant was required to make an arguable case that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive and that the judicial sentencing process did not sufficiently meet acceptable fair hearing standards, in order to avoid any serious miscarriages of justice.

Examining the sentencing process, the CCJ noted that in its judgment in Pompey v The Director of Public Prosecutions, guidance was provided to trial judges on the best practices to be followed in cases involving sexual violence on minors. In another judgment, Ramcharran v The Director of Public Prosecutions, the Court affirmed these best practices with an expectation that they will be applied as and when appropriate. Ideally, this guidance ought to be followed to ensure that constitutional standards for a fair hearing are satisfied. However, failure to do so was not fatal. The CCJ noted that these cases were not yet decided when Justice Barlow sentenced the Applicant.

In the Applicant’s case, Justice Barlow did not receive a victim impact statement; sentenced him immediately after the verdict was given and did not consider a social services report. However, the CCJ was of the view that it was evident that she considered the aggravating factors placed before her, including the young age of the complainant, the lack of a guilty plea, the Applicant’s attempt to shift blame, the repeated course of conduct, and the consequential emotional damage to the complainant. Based on these, and after having heard and considered the Applicant’s plea in mitigation, Justice Barlow determined that in the exercise of her discretion, she could not be lenient. Her approach demonstrated an intention to consider and balance relevant sentencing factors, though not necessarily as fully as advised in Pompey and Ramcharran. Her sentencing remarks also showed that the Applicant’s rehabilitation and reintegration into society were taken into account. 

With respect to his sentence, the CCJ noted that life imprisonment was the maximum penalty under the relevant section of the Sexual Offences Act and was within the range of punishment options available to Justice Barlow. The CCJ also found that the circumstances of the crime were well placed before Justice Barlow, who found no mitigating circumstances. Importantly, the CCJ observed that what made this case distinct in its severity was the special relationship of trust between the complainant and the Applicant, and the young age of the former. In addition, there were several precedents where those convicted of the crime of sexual activity and who were adults in positions of trust like the Applicant, were given life imprisonment sentences. So, in his case, the Applicant’s sentence was neither extraordinary nor manifestly excessive.  

In conclusion, the CCJ held that while the sentencing approaches and recommendations made in Pompey and Ramcharran were not precisely followed, it did not necessarily mean that Justice Barlow in the exercise of her sentencing discretion, and the Court of Appeal in its review of the process, erred in law and in fact so as to create any serious manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice. Consequently, the CCJ dismissed the application for special leave and ordered that each party should bear its own costs.

The matter was determined by Justices Maureen Rajnauth-Lee, Denys Barrow and Peter Jamadar.

Nigel Hughes, Ronald Daniels, Savannah Barnwell, Kiswana Jefford and Shawn Shewram represented the Applicant, and Teshana Lake, Assistant DPP and Diana O’Brien, Assistant DPP represented the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions.

The full judgment of the Court and judgment summary are available on the CCJ’s website at ccj.org.

Previous Post

DEPUTY PM DR. HANLEY SUCCESSFULLY PILOTS THE RASTAFARI RIGHTS RECOGNITION BILL AND THE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE (CANNABIS) BILL THROUGH PARLIAMENT

Next Post

SKELEC Joins St. Kitts Music Festival as Platinum Sponsor

Next Post
SKELEC Joins St. Kitts Music Festival as Platinum Sponsor

SKELEC Joins St. Kitts Music Festival as Platinum Sponsor

WHAT'S HOT

SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS HONOURS CENTENARIANS FOR THEIR LIFELONG CONTRIBUTIONS

SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS HONOURS CENTENARIANS FOR THEIR LIFELONG CONTRIBUTIONS

May 31, 2025
SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS APPLAUDED FOR HOSTING LANDMARK GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE ISLANDS SUMMIT

SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS APPLAUDED FOR HOSTING LANDMARK GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE ISLANDS SUMMIT

May 30, 2025
SRSP RECEIVES EC$16,000 SPONSORSHIP CHEQUE TO ENHANCE ROAD SAFETY AND LAUNCH PUBLIC EDUCATION SERIES

SRSP RECEIVES EC$16,000 SPONSORSHIP CHEQUE TO ENHANCE ROAD SAFETY AND LAUNCH PUBLIC EDUCATION SERIES

May 30, 2025

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

  • 2025
  • Attorney General, Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs
  • Bills
  • Featured
  • Featured Ministry
  • Government Projects
  • Home Page Slider
  • In Focus
  • In The News
  • Interviews
  • Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Marine Resources; Cooperatives; Entrepreneurship and Creative Economy
  • Ministry of Education, Youth; Social Development; Gender Affairs; Aging and Disabilities
  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Trade, Industry and Commerce and Consumer Affairs; Economic Development and Investment
  • Ministry of Public Infrastructure, Energy and Utilities; Domestic Transport; Information, Communication and Technology; and Posts
  • Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment; Climate Action and Constituency Empowerment
  • Ministry of Tourism, Civil Aviation; International Transport; Employment and Labour; Urban Development
  • Notices
  • Parliament
  • PMO Press Releases
  • Press Conferences
  • Press Releases
  • Prime Ministers Office, Ministry of Finance; National Security; Citizenship and Immigration; Health and Social Security
  • Register of Voters
  • Round Table
  • The Cabinet Secretariat, Cabinet Secteatry
  • Uncategorized

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK

Facebook Pagelike Widget

LOCATION

St. Kitts Nevis Information Service
Government Headquarters
Chruch Street
Basseterre
St. Kitts
Tel:(869)467-1416

FOLLOW US

  • Government of St. Kitts & Nevis

© 2020 St. Kitts & Nevis Information Service. Developed by E-Government Unit

No Result
View All Result
  • Home

© 2020 St. Kitts & Nevis Information Service. Developed by E-Government Unit